The Allen & Heath SQ series (SQ-5, SQ-6, SQ-7) is the desk English-speaking engineers reach for when they want a step up in sound and processing from the budget tier — without going to a full flagship. Built on the 96kHz XCVI core, it promises clarity and ultra-low latency in a compact box. Here’s an honest round-up of what owners actually report.
Where these takes come from
A synthesis of recurring opinions across pro-audio communities (r/livesound, Gearspace, ProSoundWeb, Sound on Sound forums) and gigging owners.
What owners love
96kHz sound and ultra-low latency
The standout praise: clarity, depth and very low latency thanks to the XCVI core. Many describe an audible step up from X32-class desks — a real reason engineers pay more.
Excellent preamps and deep processing
A&H preamps are well regarded, and the per-channel processing (PEQ, dynamics, plus a generous FX rack) is deep for the size. Owners say you rarely run out of tools.
Compact, light and well-built
Small footprint, genuinely portable, solid A&H build. A favourite for engineers who move between rooms.
Expandable I/O
DX/AR stageboxes and option cards (Dante, Waves, etc.) let the SQ scale from a small gig to a serious system.
What owners flag
1. Non-motorized faders — the big one
The most repeated caveat by far: the SQ has no motorized faders. Recalling scenes doesn’t move the faders, which divides opinion — some don’t mind, others consider it a workflow dealbreaker versus an X32.
2. Fewer faders than channels
On the SQ-5 in particular (16 faders), you work in layers, and there are no per-channel scribble strips — more layer-flipping than on larger surfaces.
3. Price above the X32/M32
You pay for the 96kHz core and A&H quality; it’s not a budget desk.
4. A learning curve
Powerful routing and processing mean a steeper start than a simple desk — owners say it clicks after some time with the touchscreen workflow.
See mixing consoles on Thomann →
SQ vs X32: the honest comparison
Owners frame it cleanly: the SQ wins on sound quality, latency, preamps and UI; the X32 wins on motorized faders, ecosystem maturity and price. If audio quality and processing matter most and you can live without motor faders, the SQ is the upgrade.
My honest take
The SQ delivers flagship-grade sound and processing in a compact, affordable-ish package — a genuine sonic step up from the budget tier. The non-motorized faders are the one thing to try before you buy: for some they’re a non-issue, for others a dealbreaker. See our complete console guide.
FAQ
Does the Allen & Heath SQ have motorized faders?
No — this is its most-discussed limitation. Scene recalls don’t move the faders, which is a workflow consideration versus an X32.
Is the SQ a step up from the X32 in sound?
Owners generally say yes, thanks to the 96kHz core, low latency and A&H preamps.
SQ-5, SQ-6 or SQ-7?
Mainly more faders and surface as you go up; the audio engine is shared. Pick by how much physical control you want.
Can it record multitrack?
Yes, via USB and option cards (including Dante/Waves) — a common use for live capture.
🎚️ Essential accessories for your mixing console
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.